Links, Forms, Publications and Tools
California Courts Judicial Branch: http://www.courts.ca.gov/626.htm
Official California Legislative Info: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/index.html
United States Federal Courts: http://www.uscourts.gov/FederalCourts.aspx
California State Criminal: http://www.courts.ca.gov/forms.htm?filter=CR
California State Civil: http://www.courts.ca.gov/forms.htm?filter=CIV
California State Small Claims: http://www.courts.ca.gov/forms.htm?filter=SC
California State Appellate: http://www.courts.ca.gov/forms.htm?filter=APP
California State Codes (Statutes): http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/calaw.html
California Discovery Law: http://california-discovery-law.com/
California Evidence Code: http://www.californiaevidence.net/California_Evidence_Code_Vol_0000_Ch_0000_Sec_0000_Par_0000_Complete_Direct_Links.htm
United States Federal Courts Forms & Fees: http://www.uscourts.gov/FormsAndFees/Forms/CourtFormsByCategory.aspx
United States Federal Bankruptcy Courts: http://www.uscourts.gov/FederalCourts/Bankruptcy.aspx
California Code of Civil Procedure: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/calaw.html
Rules of CA Court: http://courts.ca.gov/rules.htm
County Court Local Rules of Court: http://courts.ca.gov/3027.htm
Official CA Legislative Information: http://socalmilitia.ning.com/page/officia-california-legislative-information-website
California Discovery Law: http://socalmilitia.ning.com/page/california-discovery-law-1
Police Detention - Stop and Frisk - Terry v Ohio: http://socalmilitia.ning.com/page/police-detention-stop-and-frisk-t...
Vehicle Code Infractions Are Not Crimes: http://socalmilitia.ning.com/page/6519877:Page:12216
How To Fight a Traffic Ticket - "The Ticket Assassin": http://socalmilitia.ning.com/page/how-to-fight-a-traffic-ticket-the...
How to Sue a Corporation: http://socalmilitia.ning.com/page/how-to-sue-a-corporation
How to Sue a Government Agency: http://socalmilitia.ning.com/page/how-to-sue-a-government-agency
How to File a False Arrest: http://socalmilitia.ning.com/page/how-to-file-a-false-arrest-lawsuit
False Arrest Statue of Limitations: http://socalmilitia.ning.com/page/false-arrest-statute-of-limitations
Always Question Everything and Assume Nothing: http://socalmilitia.ning.com/page/always-question-everything-and-as... Constitutional Sheriff Forming Common Law Grand Juries: http://socalmilitia.ning.com/profiles/blogs/constitutional-sheriffs...
OC Voter Registration Cancellation Form: https://www.ocvote.com/registration/keeping-your-registration-up-to...
Writ of Habeas Corpus – State Form: http://www.1union1.com/habeas_corpus.htm
Writ of Habeas Corpus – Federal Form: http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO241.pdf &...;
California Law Governing Incompetency - California Penal Codes 1367-1376 : http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=pen&group...
AFFIDAVIT OF OBLIGATION = LIEN: http://civilrightsfreedom.com/node/25
UNIFORM BONDING CODE - http://civilrightsfreedom.com/node/19
Five Phases in a Civil Litigation:
4. Trial5. Post-trial
George Mercier's “The Armen Condo Letter”: http://www.constitution.org/mercier/incon000.txt
Invisible Contracts: http://www.14th-amendment.com/Miscellaneous/Articles/Invisible_Cont...
18 USC CHAPTER 96
Justice Environmental Improvement Program...Our mission statement:
“To avail the American People with standards, methods, systems & procedures that they may personally clean government; and, clean water.”
Download and read this very important document:
Every single house in the United States of America is operating in violation of the federal Public Law 92-500 (Public Health Code), aka Clean Water Act of 1972. Each home is currently discharging toxic and hazardous poisons into our drinking water supplies nationally due to gross negligence on the part of the federal, state and local governments to adopt and enforce the Public Health Code in beginning July 1,1973 due to a major conflict of interest. The result is millions of pounds of toxic carcinogens and many other health threatening pollutants being introduced into our public drinking water supplies and our oceans, killing us and our aquatic life and destroying the carbon sequestering capacity of our oceans.
This Program is designed to:
"The Tenth Amendment is the foundation of the Constitution." -Thomas Jefferson
"Posterity, you will never know how much it cost the present generation to preserve your freedom. I hope you will make good use of it. If you do not, I shall repent in heaven that ever I took half the pains to preserve it." -John Adams
The following rules only apply to a Republic such as the United States of America.
For a monarchy such as Great Britain substitute the word "baron" for "people",
and substitute the word "subject" for "citizen".
Also, in the USA, a peer is one of the people (not citizens).
In Great Britain, a peer is one of the nobility.
Common Law Grand Jury Rules: http://www.1215.org/lawnotes/lawnotes/grandjuryrules.htm
Supreme Court Ruling-The Grand Jury Belongs to the People: https://www.google.com/search?q=htttp://scannedretina.com/2013/05/2...
NDAA, NCP/PAMSS, COG, PLAW, Military Commissions Act, Patriot Act, Enemy Belligerent/Expatriation, NDRP & Other Tyrannical Laws, Rules and EO’s
We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it.
- Patrick Henry Richmond, Virginia March 23, 1775
1780-The Resolutions on Public Land. (1780)
1789-The Judiciary Act of 1789
1781-Articles of Confederation : March 1, 1781
1786-The Annapolis Convention 1786
1786-The Federalist Papers 1786-1800
1787-The United States Constitution 1787
1789-Bill of Rights 1789
1789-Doctrine of Interposition: Summary of The Doctrine of 1798
1789-Judiciary Act of 1789
1789-Kentucky Resolutions of 1798
1789-Madison speech proposing the Bill of Rights June 8, 1789
1789-Virginia Resolutions of 1798
1791-Thomas Paine - The Rights of Man (1791-1792)
1792-Militia Act of 1792
1794-Thomas Paine - The age of Reason (1794)
1798-The Sedition Act of 1798
1799-Kentucky Resolutions of 1799
1799-Virginia Report of 1799
1823-Monroe Doctrine 1823
1834-Notes On Nullification: James Madison (1834)
1851-Maritime Admiralty Law
1863-The Lieber Code: Limiting the Devastation of War (1863)
1871-District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 and here
1878-Posse Comitatus (1878)
1898-Current Operation False Flag: A Modern Primer
1903-Militia Act of 1903 (Dick Act of 1902, Efficiency of Militia Bill HR11654) The Dick Act and the Militia
1913-The Federal Reserve Act of 1913
1916- National Defense Act of 1916
1917-Trading with the Enemy Act
1917-Espionage Act of 1917
1917-The War Revenue Act of 1917
1918-The Sedition Act of 1918
1920-Merchant Marine Act of 1920 (Jones Act)
1920- National Defense Act of 1920
1924-Immigration Act of 1924
1939-Hatch Act of 1939 (An Act to Prevent Pernicious Political Activities)
1940-1940 Nationality Act and Israeli dual citizenship in Congress
1940- The Alien Registration Act of 1940 (Smith Act)
1947-Operation Paperclip: Vorticular Madness Of The Dark Magicians
1947-The Truman Doctrine, 1947
1950-McCarran Internal Security Act (Subversive Activities Control Act)
1952- Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952
1954-Communist Control Act of 1954
1961-Report from Iron Mountain - A Hoax or Betrayal?
1962-EO 10990-allows the government to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaports.
1962-EO 10995-allows the government to seize and control the communication media.
1962-EO 10997-allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals.
1962-EO 10998-allows the government to take over all food resources and farms.
1962-EO 10999-ASSIGNING EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FUNCTIONS TO THE SECRETARY OF COMMERCE
1962-EO 11000-allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision.
1962-EO 11001-allows the government to take over all health, education and welfare functions.
1962-EO 11002-designates the Postmaster General to operate a national registration of all persons.
1962-EO 11003-allows the government to take over all airports and aircraft, including commercial aircraft.
1962-EO 11004-allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate communities, build new housing with public funds, designate areas to be abandoned, and establish new locations for populations.
1962-EO 11005-allows the government to take over railroads, inland waterways and public storage facilities.
1962-EO 11049-assigns emergency preparedness function to federal departments and agencies, consolidating 21 operative Executive Orders issued over a fifteen year period.
1962-EO 11051-specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis.
1963-Codex Alimentarius And Here More Here
1964-Civil Rights Act
1966-EO 11310-grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute industrial support, to establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the President.
1968-Operation Garden Plot-And Here
1971-COINTELPRO -And Here
1974-The Kissinger Report - Implications of Worldwide Population Growth ... (1974)
1976-EO 11921-allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of production and distribution, of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit and the flow of money in U.S. financial institution in any undefined national emergency. It also provides that when a state of emergency is declared by the President, Congress cannot review the action for six months.
1978- Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act
1979-EO 12148-created the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) that is to interface with the Department of Defense for civil defense planning and funding. An “emergency czar” was appointed. FEMA has only spent about 6 percent of its budget on national emergencies, the bulk of their funding has been used for the construction of secret underground facilities to assure continuity of government in case of a major emergency, foreign or domestic.
1984-REX 84 – Your Internment Camp Awaits You- And Here- More Here
1988-EO 12656-appointed the National Security Council as the principal body that should consider emergency powers. This allows the government to increase domestic intelligence and surveillance of U.S. citizens and would restrict the freedom of movement within the United States and granted the government the right to isolate large groups of civilians. The National Guard could be federalized to seal all borders and take control of U.S. air space and all ports of entry. Many of the figures in the Iran-Contra scandal were part of this emergency contingent, including Marine Colonel Oliver North.
1993-Agenda 21 in One Easy Lesson-And Here
1993-Hatch Act Reform Amendments of 1993
1994-EO 12919-National Defense Industrial Resources Preparedness
1995-Changing Commands – The Betrayal of America’s Military
1996-Pentagon 1033 Program: Free Military Equipment to US Police Departm...
1996-Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025 (Air Force)
1996-Economic Espionage Act of 1996
2001-Authorization for the Use of Military Force PLAW 107
2001-The Secret of the Special Maritime Jurisdiction of the United State...
2004-Solving the Puzzle of Enemy Combatant Status
2006-Military Commissions Act of 2006
2006-US Army Military Police School – Civil Disturbance Operations-And Here
2007-AUMF: Authorization For Use Of Military Force in Response to the 9...
2007-Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007
2008-NSPD-51: Federal Executive Branch National Continuity Program and ...
2009-A Primer on Martial Law
2009-MIAC Report: The Modern Militia Movement 2009
2010-Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 3025.18 December 29, 2010-And Here
2010-Enemy Belligerent Interrogation, Detention & Prosecution Act AR...
2010-Inside Top Secret Amerika
2010-National Guard Domestic Law Enforcement Support and Mission Assurance Operations
2010-US Army Civil Support Operations
2010-US Army FM 3-39.40 Internment and Resettlement Operations
2011-Trans-Pacific Partnership Trade Pact And Here More Here
2011-H.R. 1505: National Security and Federal Lands Protection Act And Here
2011-National Continuity Programs (NCP) Program and Mission Support Serv...
2011-They Want US Dead
2011-Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2011
2012-Enemy Expatriation Act of 2012
2012-EO 13603-National Defense Resources Preparedness And Here
2012-EO 13629-Establishing the White House Homeland Security Partnership Council
2012-Homeland Security and Intelligence: Next Steps in Evolving the Mission And Here
2012-Hot Spots of Terrorism and Other Crimes in the United States 1970-2008 (DHS Science & Technology – Human Factors/Behavioral Science Division)
2012-HR 1540 National Defense Authorization Act 2012-Intolerable Acts NDAA
2012-Hatch Act Modernization Act of 2012
2013-Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity
2013-EO Establishment of the Presidential Commission of Election Adminis...
Introduction to Common Law
Any opinions on whether this is valid?
In A Court Room
Wed, Feb 11, 2015
Subject; Civil or Criminal Jurisdiction?
How to enforce your right to a clear hearing
To make this plan work for you, you must listen and speak it out loud, cement it in your brain and tongue until it becomes crystal clear in your own mind, and you’ll be prepared for any response.
You must be clear enough so you don’t have to stop and think, but must always be in control.
The first appearance you make in court is your arraignment, in which the purpose of the court
is to present the charges against you and find out how you intend to react; by standing up for your rights or being fearful and an easy target.
During this proceedings the judge will inform you to enter a plea of “guilty” or “not guilty”. If your choice is “no contest”, which is essentially pleading guilty without admitting guilt, be careful however because as soon as you open your mouth to enter a plea, you have given them jurisdiction over you.
If you intend to follow this novel procedure and win you must not enter a plea.
The judge’s first question to you will be something to the effect of “Do you understand the
charges against you?” [or] “How to you intend to plea?” You must say “No I don’t understand”
[or] “I cannot enter a plea until I get some questions answered first”.
The judge may be irritated and try to intimidate you. You must politely state that you need to have some questions answered before you can enter your plea. Tell him that you do not understand the nature and cause of the action against you.
Once the judge has agreed to answer your questions, your first question will be “Is this going to be a civil action or a criminal action?” In the highly unlikely chance that the judge answers your questions by saying “A civil action”, your response will be “Thank you, your honor, let the record of this court show that this is a civil action . . .”
“ . . .Your honor, since this is a civil action, I make a motion to dismiss this case for lack of a sworn complaint or an injured party; for no injured party is present.”
More likely, the judge will state that this is a criminal action, so your response will be “Thank you, your honor, let the record of this court show that this is a criminal action . . .” “. . . now I have another question, your honor. The Constitution grants this court two criminal jurisdictions; one is a criminal jurisdiction under common law; and the other is a criminal jurisdiction under admiralty or military tribunal venue from Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution. In which of these two criminal jurisdictions does the court intend to try me?”
Don’t panic if you don’t get the Article, Section, and Clause; you’ll soon have them after you have studied and practiced, but if you are afraid of getting them wrong, it would be wise to have some brief notes with that citation in it.
If the judge gives you a specific answer, you will again say “Thank you, your honor, let the
record of this court show that this action against me is under” which ever jurisdiction he replied.
However, don’t expect an easy answer to that questions as you have just exposed the court’s
fraud. The truth is that they are acting under a military tribunal which they have no right to use with you. But the judge can’t say that, and he can’t say “common law” because if he does, you will make a motion to have the case dismissed, because there is no sworn complaint by an injured party and no injured party present; exactly like you did when he said it was a civil action.
When you protest that there is no injured party, if the judge is silly enough to say that the State of [your State] is the injured party, then say “Your honor, I make a motion that this case be dismissed. We are in the wrong court. If the State is a party to the case, they cannot also be the judge and prosecutor. This case needs to be transferred to federal court, or be dismissed.”
More likely the judge will try to avoid answering and will tell you to get a license attorney for such legal advise. Your response will be “Thank you, your honor, but I don’t think you’d be violating you Oath of Office if you do your duty under the Constitution. You see, I am not seeking legal Advise, what I want to know is legal Intent. I have a right to appear as myself in my own person without a licensed attorney, and in order to intelligently defend myself, I have to know the jurisdiction that this court is operating under, because the rules of criminal procedure of common law are very different from the rules of criminal procedure under an admiralty or military law tribunal.
I need to know under which jurisdiction you intend to try me in order for me to proceed with this case . . .” “. . .the 6th Amendment grants me the right to know the jurisdiction being applied and it grants you the duty to inform me; and I don’t think you’d be violating your Oath of Office for doing your duty. Therefore, will you please answer the questions so the court is properly identified?”
If the judge still responds by telling you to get an attorney, your answer will be “Thank you, your honor, let the record of this court show that I (your name here), the accused in this criminal action, have asked the court to divulge the nature and cause of the accusation, upon the authority of the 6th Amendment, and that this court has failed in its duty to inform me of the nature and cause of the action against me . . .” “. . . furthermore, let the record also show that this court intends to bring this action against me under a secret jurisdiction known only to licensed attorneys.”
At this point the judge might claim that this is a statutory jurisdiction under the statutes of the State of [your State]. If he does so, your next statement is “Thank you, your honor, let the record of this court show that it intends to conduct a criminal action against me under a statutory jurisdiction . . .” “. . . now, your honor, that raises another question. I have never heard of such a thing as a criminal action under statutory jurisdiction, and there is no such jurisdiction established in the Constitution. I would be happy to accept this, your honor, if you could please tell me where I could find the published rules of criminal procedure under a statutory jurisdiction, and where this nature and cause jurisdiction information exists. It is imperative that I have the published rules of criminal procedure under statutory jurisdiction so that I may conduct a fair defense and a fair trial.”
Now keep in mind that the judge made up this jurisdiction. There is no granted authority for a statutory jurisdiction and no published rules. But don’t expect him to tell you that. He must either lie, dismiss the case, or unlawfully enter a plea on your behalf. In rare cases, he might even threaten to hold you in contempt. If he threatens contempt, say “Your honor, I don’t wish to be held in contempt. I am simply trying to exercise my 6th Amendment right that you disclose the nature and cause of the charges against me. I can provide court citations that show that the exercise of my Constitutional right cannot be converted into a fine. So either you identify the properly established jurisdiction or I make a motion that you dismiss this case against me.”
Also unlikely, though still possible, is that the judge will tell the truth when you ask him which criminal jurisdiction you are being tried under, and will tell you that it is admiralty jurisdiction. If this happens, you will respond “Thank you, your honor, let the record of this court show that it intends to proceed with a criminal action against me, (your name here), as a condition of contract under an admiralty jurisdiction of a military tribunal under Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 . . .” “ . . .however, your honor, you must realize that you have no such jurisdiction without also having a valid international contract in dispute. I am not aware of having entered into any international contract, so I deny that any such contract exists. Will you please ask the prosecuting attorney to inform this court if there is such a contract and if so to place it into evidence and explain how I am party to it and am compelled to perform under it. If the prosecution cannot do this, your honor, I make a motion that this case against me be dismissed.”
Of course if at any time your case is dismissed, make your pronouncement “Thank you, your
honor, let the record of this court show that this case Number (so-and so) against (your name
here) has been dismissed.” Now leave quietly and save your gloating for outside of the courtroom.
If at any time you sense an opportunity to make a motion for dismissal, make it even if it was not part of your pre-planned script. You need to be flexible and take advantage of any opportunity presented to you.
Let’s say that the judge has had enough of your questions and decides to help you out by
entering a plea of “not guilty” on your behalf. Immediately object “Your honor, I object. For you to enter a plea on my behalf is practicing law from the bench because entering a plea is my job or an attorney’s job. Has the court made a judicial determination that I am not guilty?”
Now you’ve really trapped him. For him to say “Yes”, he has admitted that you are not guilty.
At this point say “Thank you, your honor, let the record of this court show that the judge has made a judicial determination that I am not guilty.” If he says “No”, he has not made a judicial determination, so make a motion that the plea be withdrawn and that you be allowed to enter your own plea once you know the nature and cause of the case pending against you.
If the judge enters a plea of no contest, say “Your honor, I object. For you to enter a plea on my behalf is practicing law from the bench because entering a plea is my job or an attorney’s job.
I make a motion that the plea be withdrawn. For you to make a judicial determination that I am entering a plea of ‘no contest’ would result in the court treating me as though I have pled guilty, The court is trying to constrain me to an unfair plea choice in the absence of my understanding the nature and cause of the charges against me.”
Or let’s say that the judge instead gives you a continuance and demands that you obtain a
licensed attorney. Now, has the court made a judicial determination to deny me the right to defend myself in my own person and to force me into hiring a licensed attorney who will conspire with the court to try me under a secret jurisdiction known only to the judge and the licensed attorney?
If you could walk out of the court room without a dismissal, go to Step II: “Pretrial Motions”. Ask for a Motion’s hearing; or you could ask to have the motions heard at the beginning of the trial. However to ask for a Motion’s hearing here shows the judge that you are not to be railroaded so easily. Tell him that you must resolve pivotal key issues in order to continue and that these motions must be heard prior to a trial.
At a Motion’s hearing you cannot be found guilty but the case can be dismissed. Either way,
when the motions are heard, they must stand on their own and be heard and ruled on separately
from the rest. Don’t just hand over five motions and let the judge say that all are overruled. Make him rule on each one individually.
Now let’s take this from the top in the manner in which it will probably happen.
“Do you understand the charges against you?” “No your honor I do not. I need you to answer a couple of questions. I need to understand the nature and cause of the action and charges against me. Is this case going to be heard under a civil jurisdiction or a criminal jurisdiction?” “Criminal.”
“Thank you, your honor, let the record of this court show that this action against me is a
criminal action. Now I have another question, your honor. The Constitution grants this court
two criminal jurisdictions. One is a criminal jurisdiction under common law, and the other is a criminal jurisdiction under admiralty or military tribunal from Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution. In which of these two criminal jurisdictions does the court intend to try me?”
“If you don’t understand the law you need to hire an attorney.” “Thank you, your honor, but I don’t think you be violating your Oath of Office if you did your duty under the Constitution. You see, I am not seeking legal Advise. What I want to know is the legal Intent. I have the right to appear for myself in my person without a licensed attorney,
and in order to intelligently defend myself I have to know which jurisdiction that this court is operating under, because the rules of criminal procedure under a common law jurisdiction are very different from the rules of criminal procedure under an admiralty or military tribunal.
I need to know under which jurisdiction you intend to try me in order for me to proceed with this case. The 6th Amendment grants me the right to know the jurisdiction being applied and it grants you the duty to inform me, and I don’t think you’d be violating your oath of office for doing your duty. Therefore will you please answer the questions so this court is properly
“This is a court of statutory jurisdiction under the laws of the State of (your State).”5
“Thank you, your honor, let the record of this court show that it intends to conduct a criminal action against me under a statutory jurisdiction. Now, your honor, that raises another question. I have never heard of such a thing as a criminal action under statutory jurisdiction, and there is no such jurisdiction established in the Constitution. I would be happy to accept this, your honor, if you could please tell me where I could find the published rules of criminal procedure under a statutory jurisdiction. And where this nature and cause and jurisdiction information exists. It is imperative that I have the published rules of criminal procedure under statutory jurisdiction so that I may conduct a fair defense and a fair trial.”
“Look, I’m just going to enter a plea in your behalf and set a trial date. I enter a plea of no contest.” “Your honor, I object. For you to enter a plea on my behalf is practicing law from the bench because offering a plea is my or my attorney’s job. For you to make a judicial determination that I am entering a plea of no contest would result in the court treating me as though I had pled guilty. The court is trying to constrain me to an unfair plea choice in the absence of my understanding of the nature and cause of the charges against me. I make a motion that the plea be withdrawn, and that this case be dismissed because the court has failed to identify my legitimate jurisdiction.
“I deny that motion. Your trial date will be . . .”
“Your honor, I would like to request that we set a Motions hearing prior to the trial date, for I must resolve pivotal issues in order to continue, and these motions must be heard prior to the trial so that I can properly defend myself.”
Now you are informed of the hidden facts
(veracity not verified)
Ginny ~ Thanx for allowing me to re-live my October 2010 arrest, in my driveway, for the exact same "crime".
The female-dog-of-a-deputy altered the dash cam footage and removed the soundtrack entirely, while the CO's in the jail (after threatening me that "we have everything you say on surveillance film") somehow allowed the footage to be "routinely destroyed" AFTER I told them, right then & there, to make sure it was preserved for trial. Gestapo, indeed!
I always tell any interested party to lodge a counterclaim and makes these cretins face the court as defendants themselves.
On a somewhat related note, we just discovered that the judge in our suit overtly LIED into the record, and is trying to prevent us from procuring the trial transcripts...it just gets more & more sideways when the power elite families get caught in fraud, by mere pro se's nonetheless, and simply add more fraud on top of the last. We'll share the details soon, m'dear.
I've gotta go write a declaration, so, bye for now....Jas
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:18:00 -0800
Subject: Wrongfully arrested motorcyclist who had helmet cam seized by Dallas County Sheriff’s deputy sues for $1 million