Order Multiple Hard Copies of the Pocket Constitution and Declarati... Win more arguments.
Judicial Watch Non-partisan, conservative organization that serves as an ethical and legal watchdog over the U.S. Government and judicial systems
American Center of Law and Justice is an organization dedicated to protecting your religious and constitutional freedoms
Constitutional Sheriffs and Police Officers Association stands behind enforcing the U.S. Constitution, nullifying unconstitutional laws/regulations and setting an example for appropriate law enforcement conduct.
http://www.articlesoffreedom.us/ The electrifying product of the 2009 "Continental Congress!" Also a downloadable file at the bottom of this page.
Bill of Rights Enforcement Site
Useful Constitution Site
New Constitutional Studies site (ConstitionalClub)
LOADED with useful stuff!
Educational videos forwarded by Lana
About the Courts
After 20 years of personal study, I released my own analysis of the monetary system, providing the essential information every American should understand about how our monetary system is responsible for the creation, growth, and perpetuation of debt, and the declining value of our money, incomes, savings, and investments. The information has been released in various forms to encourage its dissemination.
o video short - 1913: The year our Republic was overthrown
Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars. an anonymous report
THIS IS A MUST READ REPORT. It is so important, in fact, a PDF version has been created. It can be viewed and downloaded from here (find the image of the report and click on it). The report documents a systematic and scientifically-operated scheme for controlling people, societies, and governments using various tools, chief among them the monetary systems of the various nations.
THE FEDERAL RESERVE
Lord Monckton, a former science advisors to British prime minister Margaret Thatcher, gave the speech that stopped Cap-and-Trade in its tracks, at least for a while. Watch Lord Moncton's St. Paul speech in St. Paul as he explains it is not about science; it is about the sovereignty of the United States and the future of Liberty.
Michael Badnarik's class on the U.S. Constitution is well worth viewing. It is long, so you may want to view it a few videos at a time.
Aaron Russo was the producer of Trading Places, Wise Guys, and The Rose. After befriending one of the Rockefellers and learning of the elites' plan for global governance, he dedicated his life to waking people up. He produced the Mad As Hell documentaries, and his final film Freedom To Fascism. Upon his death in 2007 at the age of 64, his website Restore The Republic was handed off to Gary S. Franchi Jr..
David Horowitz, a former member of the New Left and now an American conservative, has a lot to say that is worth hearing.
Yuri Bezmenov was a Soviet spy assigned to further Communism in India. In time, he grew to love the Indian people and resent the KGB oppression, which resulted in his defection to the West. His 1980s anti-Communist lectures and books are worth studying.
Robert Welch gave a speech in 1958 predicting the 10-point plan to subordinate the United States to a Communist world government.
Norman Dodd exposes a conspiracy to subjugate the United States and other nations of the world to a World Government. As chief investigator in 1953 for the Reece Committee into tax-exempt foundations, he had access to information not normally available outside government, from which he concluded tax-exempt foundations (such as the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Rockefeller Foundations, Ford Foundation, and others) were using tax-exempt foundations to move tax-free money into tax-exempt organizations designed to bring about world government, in part through control of education. A very credible individual, well worth your time. - Norman Dodd: The Hidden Agenda for World Government. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
The decline of America's economy is aptly displayed in an animated map entitled "The Decline: The Geography of a Recession."
Charlotte Iserbyt talks about the dumbing down of the world. She "served as Senior Policy Advisor in the Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI), U.S. Department of Education, during the first Reagan Administration. Ever since, she's been exposing how educational systems throughout the world have been gradually, and by design, homogenized under UNESCO coordination. The purpose has been to create a dumbed down, collectivized, easily manageable, global population that could be transitioned to a world governance system run on a Soviet type system -- a global slave plantation -- for the benefit of the dominant global hierarchy of world bankers and 'noble' families." [source: The LibertyChannel]
Reading Library on America- Great- founding documents, law, history, etc.
We have a lot of documents that Affirm your rights! Now, here are some that endeavor to ROB you of your God-given rights supposedly guaranteed by the Constitution and the govt. it authorized:
A shocker: The Treason Documents:
New States Constitution USSA Fascist dream constitution
The unconstitutional ICLEI (Agenda 21) charter
Note to readers/posters: Reader comments are in chronological, indented sequence, with the newest ones on the higher-numbered pages below. You must be registered on this site to post.
John Warner Defense (HR 5122) and Military Commissions Acts- Do You Think They're Constitutional?
Rec'd from Mairi. Some Constitutional research groups have determined that some amendments to the U.S. Constitution weren't legally ratified. It appears there is good proof of this. No wonder these groups are on the DHS enemies list. Regime is scared s___ of them.
Let me preface my e-mail with 2 true statements. First, I have been fooled before. I worked online for Allen West (first campaign ONLY!) and I now despise that traitor.
2nd, I can spend my 'campaign dollars' anywhere I like in America. I have given to candidacies outside my voting district and State. I can....and might.....contribute to your campaign if/when you answer a few questions I have while the "Who's" song "We Don't Get Fooled Again" is still fresh in my mind.
If elected, do you intend to reinstate the original XIII Amendment (which means attorneys/lawyers MUST vacate their federally elected offices)? The amendment WAS legally passed and ratified, and IS part of our Constitution.
Do you intend to remove the illegal XIV, XVI, and XVII Amendments? The XIV was passed when the southern elected legislators were forced out of the House and Senate at gun point, and then signed into law by William Seward. (He was never the POTUS, and therefore incapable of signing that illegal bit of legislation into law.) The XVI and XVII were never legally ratified. (I haven't got information on the XVth at present.)
Do you intend to remove the National State of Emergency which has been strangling America since 1933?
Do you intend to have Barack indicted, tried, and punished for the fraud he has committed against the American people, and for being in a perpetual state of treason against America, by arming our enemies, both foreign and domestic, by unlawfully usurping powers NOT delegated to him, breach of the Logan Act, etc.? His identity fraud must be addressed. No one even knows who he really is, or where he comes from. If, as he claims, BHO, Sr. is his daddy, then he is not NBC by SCOTUS rule. If his daddy is someone different, then it is just another act of fraud on his part. I don't care if he was born on the carpet in the Oval office. He must prove, beyond ALL doubt, who his real parents are, and where he was in fact born. Americans have a right to know, not only those simple truths, but also see his school records. I am praying the rumors of his time in school as a "foreign' student may finally be dispelled.
These questions are good for starters, but for each that you answer "yes," to, I expect an outline of how you intend to accomplish the goal. We all saw Allen West 'talk-the-talk' campaigning, and then ultimately REFUSE to 'walk-the-walk' once in office. Fool me once......
I thank you and Allen West for your military service, however, military service does NOT automatically mean you are qualified for office. WOW! Did Allen West ever PROVE that!
P. S. - I am sending this to those I work with online. I know they will be anxious for your response. I work with theBEST Patriots! You may have a lot more support than you bargained for if you know your "TRUE" American history, not the garbage we have been fed through the NEA. Two EXCELLENT sites that 'may' help you answer the posed questions:
June 13, 1967 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE 15641
Mr. RARICK. Mr. Speaker, arrogantly ignoring clearcut expressions in the Constitution of the United States, the declared intent of its drafters notwithstanding, our unelected Federal judges read out prohibitions of the Constitution of the United States by adopting the fuzzy haze of the 14th amendment to legislate their personal ideas, prejudices, theories, guilt complexes, aims, and whims.
Through the cooperation of intellectual educators, we have subjected ourselves to accept destructive use and meaning of words and phrases. We blindly accept new meanings and changed values to alter our traditional thoughts.
We have tolerantly permitted the habitual misuse of words to serve as a vehicle to abandon our foundations and goals. Thus, the present use and expansion of the 14th amendment is a sham—serving as a crutch and hoodwink to precipitate a quasi-legal approach for overthrow of the tender balances and protections of limitation found in the Constitution.
But, interestingly enough, the 14th amendment—whether ratified or not—was but the expression of emotional out-pouring of public sentiment following the War Between the States.
Its obvious purpose and intent was but to free human beings from ownership as a chattel by other humans, Its aim was no more than to free the slaves.
As our politically appointed Federal judiciary proceeds down their chosen path of chaotic departure from the peoples' government by substituting their personal law rationalized under the 14th amendment, their actions and verbiage brand them and their team as secessionists—rebels with pens instead of guns—seeking to divide our Union.
They must be stopped. Public opinion must be aroused. The Union must and shall be preserved.
Mr. Speaker, I ask to include in the RECORD, following my remarks, House Concurrent Resolution 208 of the Louisiana Legislature urging this Congress to declare the 14th amendment illegal. Also, I include in the RECORD an informative and well-annotated treatise on the illegality of the 14th amendment—the play toy of our secessionist judges—which has been prepared by Judge Leander H. Perez, of Louisiana.
The material referred to follows:
H. Con. Res. 208
A concurrent resolution to expose the unconstltutlonallty of the 14th admendment to the Constitution of the United States; to Interpose the sovereignty of the State of Louisiana against the execution of said amendment In this State; to memorlallze the Congress of the United States to repeal Its joint resolution of July 28, 1868, declaring that said amendment had been ratified; and to provide for the distribution of certified copies of this resolution
Whereas the purported 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution was never lawfully adopted In accordance with the requirements of the United States Constitution because eleven states of the Union were deprived of their equal suffrage In the Senate in violation of Article V, when eleven southern states, Including Louisiana, were excluded from dellberatlon and decision In the adoption of the Joint Resolution proposing said 14th Amendment; said Resolution was not presented to the President of the United States In order that the same should take effect, as required by Article 1. Section 7; the proposed amendment was not ratified by three-fourths of the states, but to the contrary fifteen states of the then thirty-seven states of the Union rejected the proposed 14th Amendment between the dates of Its submission to the states by the Secretary of State on June 16, 1866 and March 24, 1868, thereby nulllfying said Resolution and making It Impossible for ratification by the constitutionally required three-fourths of such states; said southern states which were denied their equal suffrage in the Senate had been recognized by proclamations of the President of the United States to have duly constituted governments with all the powers which belong to free states of the Union, and the Legislatures of seven of said southern states had ratified the 13th Amendment which would have failed of ratification but for the ratification of said seven southern states; and
Whereas the Reconstruction Acts of Congress unlawfully overthrew their existing governments, removed their lawfully constituted legislatures by m!l!tary force and replaced them with rump legislatures which carried out m!l!tary orders and pretended to ratify the 14th Amendment; and
Whereas in spite of the fact that the Secretary of State In his first proclamation, on July 20, 1868, expressed doubt as to whether three-fourths of the required states had ratified the 14th Amendment, Congress nevertheless adopted a resolution on July 28, 1868, unlawfully declaring that three-fourths of the states had ratified the 14th Amendment and directed the Secretary of State to so proclaim, said Joint Resolution of Congress and the resulting proclamation of the Secretary of State Included the purported ratifications of the military enforced rump legislatures of ten southern states whose lawful legislatures had previously rejected said 14th Amendment, and also Included purported ratifications by the legislatures of the States of Ohio and New Jersey although they had withdrawn their legislative ratifications several months previously, all of which proves absolutely that said 14th Amendment was not adopted In accordance with the mandatory constitutional requirements set forth In Article V of the Constitution and therefore the Constitution Itself strikes with nulllty the purported 14th Amendment.
Now therefore be It resolved by the Legislature of Louisiana, the House of Representatives and the Senate concurring:
(1) That the Legislature go on record as exposing the unconstltutionallty of the 14th Amendment, and interposes the sovereignty of the State of Louisiana against the execution of said 14th Amendment against the State of Louisiana and Its people;
(2) That the Legislature of Louisiana opposes the use of the invalld 14th amendment by the Federal courts to Impose further unlawful edicts and hardships on Its people;
(3) That the Congress of the United States be memorlallzed by this egislature to repeal its unlawful Joint Resolution of July 28, 1868, declaring that three-fourths of the states had ratified the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution;
(4) That the Legislatures of the other states of the Union be memoriallzed to give serious study and consideration to take similar action against the valldity of the 14th Amendment and to uphold and support the Constitution of the United States which strikes said 14th Amendment with nuility; and
(5) That copies of this Resolution, duly certified, together with a copy of the treatise on "The Unconstltutionallty of the 14th Amendment" by Judge L. H. Perez, be forwarded to the Governors and Secretaries of State of each state in the Union, and to the Secretaries of the United States Senate and House of Congress, and to the Louisiana Congressional delegation, a copy hereof to be publlshed in the Congressional Record.
VAIL M. DELONY,
Speaker 0/ the House 0/ Representatives,
C. C. AYCOCK.
Lieutenant Governor and President of the Senate.
Your thoughts on this? Exagerrated or real?
Visit Constitution Club at: http://constitutionclub.ning.com/?xg_source=msg_mes_network
This predates Ovomit, with Bush Patriot Act, et al, but slimeball has taken it to a new level of madness.
Today is Constitution Day, from Santa Barbara Tea Party ....
|"We the People" Establish Our Contract
With the Federal Govt.
227 Years Ago Today
"It will be of little avail to the people that laws are made by men of their own choice if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, so incoherent that they cannot be understood: if they be repealed or revised before they are promulgated, or undergo such incessant changes that no man who knows what the law is today can guess what it will be tomorrow."
- Alexander Hamilton from The Notes by Ronald Reagan
Our Constitution is 227 years old today. It is under assault like it has never been before. We have a president who thinks that the document is nothing more than a collection of suggestions. We have a congress that considers its tenets when it suits their particular agenda and ignores them when it doesn't. We have a prosecutorial philosophy that is willing to put its agenda above its sworn duty to uphold the law. We have a judiciary that seems to have the idea that it means whatever they choose for it to mean based on each individual judge's personal feelings.
To provide examples of these claims, we have a president that disobeys the law at every turn on illegal immigration, he ignores the law on the implementation of ObamaCare, he covers up scandal after scandal, including Fast and Furious, IRS, Benghazi, among many other examples of his violations too numerous to list.
We have a Congress who, contrary to Article 1, Section 1 of the Constitution, delegates to the executive branch its responsibilities. It's called administrative law. No such power resides in the Constitution. The section reads, "All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives" (emphasis mine.) For example, and in a particularly egregious fashion, the ObamaCare law has this phrase punctuated throughout the document, "the administrator shall decide." We have an EPA department spewing law, we have an HHS department spewing law, we have Homeland Security spewing law, and, again, many many more executive departments issuing law that they have no authority to do. The law-making process was intended to be a public process where the issues were debated and laws enacted in full public view. Have you ever heard the phrase, "Ignorance of the law is no excuse"? With literally millions of laws, how can anyone know what they are? My how far we have come in the wrong direction.
What about prosecutorial philosophy? The prosecutor is the most powerful agent in the legal system. A prosecutor can decide whether to bring charges or not, can decide how serious those charges are, can decide based on whatever criteria they choose. What about our Attorneys General? Here in California, we have the perfect example of this discretion - when Kamala Harris refused to represent the people of the State in defending Proposition 8. Whether or not you agree with Proposition 8, Harris had a responsibility to plead on behalf of the people's decision. She refused. What about the US Attorney General? He chose to ignore the New Black Panther indictment when he took office, a case that was practically already won. He colludes with miscreants in the IRS to hide the illegal targeting of conservative groups. More recently, he chose to investigate a white on black shooting in Ferguson but continues to ignore black on white and black on black crime. In fact, there were 31 people shot and 7 killed in Chicago the same weekend that the Ferguson shooting took place. Where is Eric Holder on these incidents? We are all Americans. We all want justice. Skin color is not a deciding factor, justice is, and justice is sorely lacking in our legal system today. It is even worse when you consider the massive administrative law mentioned above.
Finally, about the judiciary. Former Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall once said, infamously, "You do what you think is right and let the law catch up." This philosophy has permeated the judiciary. This statement is in complete opposition to the Constitution, as written. It embraces the erroneous idea of a "living" Constitution. It also makes every judge in the system a decider, based on his or her personal agenda, of what the Constitution means. The most egregious example is ObamaCare. The whole thing is unconstitutional, based on Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution. Nowhere does it say that the federal government can do this (or a huge number of other things it does.) Yet judges think that it is no big deal. And clearly, according to Justice Marshall, if you are a lawyer with a black robe, you can rule any way you want, particularly if you reside on the Supreme Court.
Tea Partiers, we cannot be complacent. This is not a time to stay home. Pick up something you can do beyond your normal daily routine. Volunteer to walk precincts for a day, or make phone calls, or host a meet-and-greet for a conservative candidate. The only way we can change things is to get the right people elected. Please do something, even if it is small. If nothing else, read Article 1 Section 8 and see for yourself what the federal government is supposed to be doing. And re-read the Bill of Rights. They are all on the Internet. Please, we need your help. The sanctity of our Constitution depends on you.
Go, Judge Hanen!Notice of Electronic Filing
The following transaction was entered on 4/7/2015 at 7:17 PM CDT and filed on 4/7/2015
Case Name: State of Texas et al v. United States of America et al Case Number: 1:14-cv-00254 Filer: Document Number: 225
ORDER denying  Motion to Stay. Having considered the Emergency Motion to Stay [Doc. No. 150], the briefing filed byboth sides, and the argument of counsel, the Court hereby denies the Governments Motion toStay its February 16, 2015 Order of Temporary Injunction.(Signed by Judge Andrew S. Hanen) Parties notified.(rdv, 1)
1:14-cv-00254 Notice has been electronically mailed to:
Adam Nicholas Bitter firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
Adam P KohSweeney email@example.com
Angela V Colmenero angela.colmenero@TexasAttorneyGeneral.gov, firstname.lastname@example.org
Anne E Egeler anneE1@atg.wa.gov
Antonio Tony Martinez email@example.com
Bradley Heath Cohen firstname.lastname@example.org
Cally Younger email@example.com
Chirag G. Badlani firstname.lastname@example.org
Dale L. Wilcox email@example.com
Daniel David Hu firstname.lastname@example.org, JJones5@usa.doj.gov, sKempen@usa.doj.gov
Daniel P Lennington email@example.com, WelteAJ@DOJ.STATE.WI.US
David A. Lopez firstname.lastname@example.org
Dwight Carswell email@example.com
Eric Alan Hudson Eric.firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
Eric E Murphy email@example.com
Gabriel Markoff firstname.lastname@example.org
Harold William Van Allen email@example.com
Ilya Shapiro firstname.lastname@example.org
J Jorge deNeve email@example.com
Jay Alan Sekulow firstname.lastname@example.org
John Campbell Barker email@example.com
Jonathan D Weissglass firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
Jonathon Alden Moseley Contact@JonMoseley.com
Joseph C Chapelle email@example.com
Kyle Renee Freeny firstname.lastname@example.org
Leif A. Olson email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
Linda Jane Smith email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; DocketingLA@dlapiper.com
Michael M. Hethmon firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
Mitchell Lee Herren firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
Nina Perales firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
Patrick R. Wyrick firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
Peter Margulies firstname.lastname@example.org
Peter J Rusthoven email@example.com
Richard Dearing firstname.lastname@example.org
Ryan S Post email@example.com
Scott A. Keller firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org,email@example.com
1:14-cv-00254 Notice has not been electronically mailed to:
Kathleen R Hartnett
US Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530
PO Box 33
Palatka, FL 32178
The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:Document description:Main Document
Electronic document Stamp:
[STAMP dcecfStamp_ID=1045387613 [Date=4/7/2015] [FileNumber=21273849-0